Results speak louder than words don't they? However, you do need to remember that a long list of "victories" can be very misleading and if you see a website or "junk mail" advertising "victories" please don't read too much into it - any one can type up a list of numbers, initials, dates etc and present it as victories and if you do see one of those attorneys then please make sure they can show you documented proof of those victories. You will find that they can't. In addition, you won't find the "premier" law firms showing you a long list of victories. Go check out Lawrence Taylor's website. He DOES NOT advertise by showing you a long list of victories.

I have decided to take a "middle of the road" approach and show you a list of the "TYPES" of results that can be achieved for you and that have been achieved for our clients in the past. (These results do not guarantee success in your case).



"Not Guilty" at trial.

No charges filed.

Reduced to "Dry Reckless."

Reduced to "Wet Reckless."

Reduced to "3 One-Pointers."

No license suspension - 1st DUI.

No license suspension - 2nd DUI.

2nd DUI - prior dismissed.

3rd DUI - both priors dismissed.

3 DUIs in one month - no jail.

DUI Drugs - Dismissed.

DUI with refusal - reduced to "Disturbing the Peace."

DUI & Evading - Dismissed.

ACTUAL EXAMPLE: Motion to Suppress Evidence

On June 24, 1999 Mr. C.H. was arrested for a DUI in El Cajon. He was stopped by a San Diego Sheriff's patrol officer in a Ralph's grocery store parking lot. Because of way in which the Deputy stopped him, tested him, and arrested him, a motion to suppress the evidence was filed on his behalf. During the hearing on the motion the deputy testified as to his observations and his reasons for contacting Mr. C.H. The deputy could not give any reason (no specific fact; circumstance; or violation of law) for his contacting Mr. C.H. In essence, the deputy had "a hunch." After all of the testimony, argument by myself and the prosecuting attorney the Judge began his ruling by using the phrase "It is difficult to be a Monday morning quarterback." The judge went on to explain to the Deputy and to the prosecution why he was suppressing the evidence. The end result was that the Judge agreed with me that the evidence should be suppressed because the officer had no reasonable suspicion to stop Mr. C.H. to begin with. Since there was no reasonable cause to stop him, everything that happened after the stop was thrown out. This left the DA with no case.

These sample results do not guarantee success in your case. Consult with a San Diego DUI Lawyer before proceeding.

Warning: file_get_contents() [function.file-get-contents]: URL file-access is disabled in the server configuration in /home/califor/public_html/simplereader.php on line 53

Warning: file_get_contents(http://www.fox6.com/rss/800.rss) [function.file-get-contents]: failed to open stream: no suitable wrapper could be found in /home/califor/public_html/simplereader.php on line 53
No news at present, please check back later.

Print Page

Email Page to Friend